Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26102520-20150217150045/@comment-26102520-20150223003448

I brought up opening nominations because in the event Admins are demoted as a result of this discussion, it will be good to have someone take their place. However, I do see the sense in waiting for suitable candidates to appear first.

Now, for evaluations...I think Bella8991 and Raurauslly.music are the Admins that require taking action against (due to the 6-month inactivity limit). Bella8991 has tried to make an effort by commenting here and editing recently, but that's hardly enough to account for a lack of edits since June. I move to relieve Bella8991 of her Bureaucrat rights, but since she has shown interest in maintaining her activity, her Admin rights should stay...for the time being. For Raurauslly.music, I move to remove her rights after March 6, if she has not come back at that time (she is currently sitting at 5 months inactivity).

I also propose amending policy so that Admins are held to a higher standard. I think a 3-month period of inactivity would be more appropriate.