Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24199126-20150305000055/@comment-25389622-20150404124924

Jjuser, you did say this in an edit summary: "It think it's appropriate to keep OOU and IU separate". Though if your stance has changed, then I have no problem with that :-)

Now the word flow: "It FLOWS because it's clear, and it's clear because it's concise"

That's how Heimr defined it to me, but that doesn't really work here because trivia does not "flow" in that sense. I suppose a better word would be "chronology"; have IU events in as if they were on a timeline. I mean, the point about chocolate could go "where" it was first mentioned in the film - the ball scene. I say "where" because you are not necessarily going to have a piece of trivia for every scene, so it will have to go in between to points on a relative timeline. Just some kind of structure. But if we go for an OOU framework, then things such as the teaser trailer should go at the start. But I still think that the teaser trailer and the OUAT points are different, if not simply for the fact that the teaser trailer has more to do with the canon; it resembles themes seen in the film, and the characters are the same with the same personalities. OUAT is not canon, so I suppose that it is discriminated in some way. But let's not open up the OUAT argument again ;-)

Do we at least agree that trivia can be organised, like in the case of the books? The two points were linked, and so there's reason to have them together. And if there is a lot of trivia based on things that occurred IU, then why shouldn't they be organised in some way? Trivia can get really messy, as it has in the past.