Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25389622-20141101150445/@comment-24199126-20150127230852

The Anna and Elsa books are one thing, but what about when Frozen Fever comes out? At that point, the chronology really is anybody's guess. So long as the information is on the book pages, it's not as if the Wiki is missing the content.

Actually, I never used the word "policy". It's a precedent that's been established on the majority of our articles, even before we began the rewrites. As I've said, it's never been an issue before, so it's certainly notable that it is problematic now, which is why I based this to be largely your preference. Since we can go back and forth with our personal preference of the image position, all we have to fall back on is the standard. Why go against precedent when there is no reason to, especially since there are practical grounds for alternating the images? Now the practicality of alternating images is more applicable to when a page has a large number of images, i.e. Anna or Elsa, but so long as it's there, for the sake of having a consistent style across articles, it's how it should be done across the Wiki. You may consider my argument to be based on my personal preference, but like it or not, it has a shred of practicality to it. On the other hand, your argument completely revolves around appearances, which is completely subjective.

Hmm perhaps we should get a second input on the palace image ... or editing in general. It's very hard making a decision when things are split 50/50.

I've been watching a lot of Criminal Minds lately. Just a way of telling myself, "Hey, at least you aren't dealing with these psychos".