Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25389622-20141101150445/@comment-24199126-20150103005422

Darn it, the runes would have been nice :(. May I ask which browser you are using? I tried on Google Chrome and I got the squares too, but Firefox shows the runes. If that doesn't work, I'll just remove them because the squares look weird.

Good idea, we'll wait for Frozen Fever.

Okay your discussion:

1) For the Duke, since we don't know his name, I think substituting as "the Duke" is good. Similarly, if Agdar and Idun were unnamed, then they'd be "the King" and "the Queen". Good catch there on sentence case :)

2) Present tense should be used on an article if it's applicable and the character is still alive. However, the history sections must be past tense since it has all occurred already.

3) The way I see it, the book is good on its own page, but elsewhere, the film's events are what take precedence for us.

4) For the books, it's tricky because we lack the exact time-frame each one takes place. So if we include one book, we don't know how the other stories fit into the same timeline. Thus, the book pages can cover most of the character histories (the books are listed under "Appearances" anyway). If ever we get an idea of the order of the books, then we can consider placing them in the character articles, but for now, we don't know how they fit into the timeline relative to each other, so I'd say to keep them out of the character articles. Their individual pages should contain the information anyway.