Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25389622-20141101150445/@comment-25389622-20150113155657

That's cool. I won't talk about it too much here, but I'm interested :-) I'm not too sure how scholarships and all work, and whether that is what I will be getting. I haven't heard the term used yet. I'll let you know what happens. I'll be definitely choosing the one that gives the best education :-) It'll cost me a maximum of £9,000 a year, so it looks as if I'll be paying at least £27,000.

Yeah, that was it :-) No need to look for it now :P I think that it also compared the idea to Frozone. So is it less than 90%? I put 90%+ because I wasn't too sure. Woah, I looked and it's about 60%(ish), sorry for my ignorance :D I guess we'll have to go with magic, and that Anna was turned to solid ice, and then back to "not ice". We don't know for sure how that would work. I feel as if it is a bit of a cop-out to say it like that, but we just don't know. It's an assumption made when you watch the film. Their universe is one that contains magic. Do we really want to the whole 9 yards and try and explain it? It's not that I wouldn't, it's just that I don't think that we could, and it would simply turn into a speculative game. I will just say that the observation alone of Anna's solid form may not be enough to definitely say, "she is 100% ice". She could just have a glossing of ice... But from what Pabbie said I guess that it is safe to assume that solid ice is the case.

Yeah, I said that it was slightly different or something like that, well it's quite different anyway. Submerging into very cold water for that matter. It's not impossible to freeze all of the water in your body into solid ice, I think that that is slightly different to if you were to turn into solid ice. Maybe you could say that Elsa can turn organic material into solid ice. Either way, there is no example that we have to go on showing her freeze something "not living" into actual ice, and with Anna it was more indirectly anyway - it wasn't instantaneous. I say "not living" instead of inorganic because you could argue that with the right inorganic compounds, one could make something organic. Where be the line? Who knows if one day we could do it? We can't now, you are correct, but we may be able to in the future. That statement is very true. Imagine taking say a phone back to the Middle Ages. People would lose their nut. There's a case (I can't remember the specifics, but their nickname was the Cargo Cult) of this tribe on an island where they saw planes going overhead during the Second World War, and they thought that these were sent by their gods, but the white man had stolen the planes or something and tricked them. I wouldn't say that cryogenics is not a possibility in practice, but with current technology it is.

We'll focus on the locations for now. Have you had a chance to look about that template?

It is all too easy. I do wonder though if we were to be attacked by something bigger than one person and they erased everything in some way. How well backed up is everything? Or is it impossible not to be able to revert something? I wouldn't worry too much. The only reason to delete it is the worry that a small person might see it. It was pretty bad but I don't think that anyone will see it... Your call.