Thread:Varg2000/@comment-24199126-20150130132615/@comment-5189655-20150130145953

Really, what is it that makes the books canonical but not the television adaptation? OUAT is based upon and expanding upon the original film aswell. Let's take for example, OUAT and the new book series Anna & Elsa, both are alternate continuations upon the film, and both are officially licensed and marketed as real but alternate continuations upon the film and both are equally canonical (even if canonical in the sense of alternate continuations). There is basically no differences from Anna and Elsa in the film/books and Anna and Elsa from Once Upon a Time other than that they are portrayed in live-action instead of animation or cartoons.

OUAT treated Frozen as if it was part of the show and respected the very established world from the film. They are the same people and they do live the same lives (it's just an alternative continuation, as is the book-series Anna & Elsa for example), and it's more than obvious while watching it, it's blatantly stated by the creators of the show. There is really no difference and I still don't find this as reasonable grounds for not including it. I mean it's part of the franchise and I think it would fit perfectly on a wiki such as this.

Alright, I will be waiting with excitement!