Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26102520-20150217150045/@comment-26102520-20150227155619

I wasn't suggesting removing all rights but rather evaluating all of you Admins so that we could work from there. Bella8991 may be "co-founder" but like Fruipit said above, that has little bearing on the issue. Besides, from the thread I linked, it seems Littlerat1 was the actual founder and literally everyone on this thread agreed to remove her rights. You say Littlerat1's case is different from Bella8991's, I disagree. Their contribution history is very similar. There's a low count of both content or code related edits. For both, thread edits are predominant...I've even provided concrete PROOF of Bella8991 having poor edits. You say you enjoy working with the Admins but Bella8991 and Raurauslly.music are hardly around enough for there to even be a working relationship. There are real life situations, but there's a reason the policy even lists out a time where enough is enough.

Having inactive Admins hurts the site. I haven't been here long, but in the time I have, I've seen only one Admin doing any reasonable amount of work. Quiet wiki or not, there still is a lot of work that needs doing and with only one user actually using their site maintenance tools to the fullest, progress is and will be slow.

Another thing, you say the current Admins shouldn't be demoted, which suggests you think you guys are capable on your own. Yet, you suggest opening up nominations so the "department" has some extra help.