Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5189655-20150205205704/@comment-5189655-20150212213348

Humphry02 wrote: No, I'm done. I've now said all I have to. It's ultimately up to the community now. We have reached a stalemate. Just, two things: I don't care how convinced  you  are of something, present the evidence that WDAS considers the books in this way. Secondly, no one, said about anything becoming canon  automatically . To quote a wise man: " I will concede that calling the books canon is similarly speculative, but this is where we can exercise some common sense." Common sense, analysis of evidence, and sound conclusion based on such reasoning. You may say what you are saying about how they should not be considered canon, but what is the evidence to suggest that they should be?

As it stands:

For adding OUAT article(s): 4

Against such a notion: 4

Undecided/willing to give the notion more consideration: 1 Can I have a link to that definition please?

Indeed, what is the evidence that the books should be considered canon? I believe the only thing that could show that is an official statement from all the people in charge of the franchise. By the way, I don't care how much you are convinced of something either. It's common sense to not consider every new product as canon, but as alternate continuations. Only an official statement can show these products to be canon.