Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26102520-20150217150045/@comment-25389622-20150217203456

The policy states that six months of inactivity is inadequate, so this is what should be used as a guideline for when admins should be considered in having their rights revoked.

I don't know the other administrators very well, but I know that for Dragonboy his absence is only temporary. He is still mediating discussion, and he certainly hasn't abandoned the re-write. Should it come to it, I will defend him and his position on this Wiki.

May we also look at the admins and their main areas (what they focus on). So, because Mojo is not resolving conflicts, and hasn't done for a while now, her main focus should be changed. Or if she has no focus and is not fulfilling her duties as an administrator, then her rights should be removed because she is inactive. It is bad when it says "go to this person for this" and then that user has an inactive template or simply does not respond. Although Mojo has responded to me before, it's just that's the only time that she is active.

I am all for review of the admins, but I will reiterate that I think, if not exempt from this, I will defend Dragonboy and his rights on this Wiki.