Board Thread:For Our Admins/@comment-24199126-20141001012639/@comment-25389622-20141003003253

Look at the images I made on my page and see if you think that they're manipulation. I'm trying to show some of the themes present in the movie. When you say that someone has put a lot of effort into something, well I'm not too sure what you mean. The animators put effort into the images, but a lot of the images are stills from the movie, and I would imagine anyway that they know people will use them for their own creative uses (whether that's a good thing or not. I see a lot of what is good to be on this Wiki. The bad and the ugly can be left to the rest of the internet). Once you have the basic models and components posters for the film and stuff like that become easy to produce. Be clear on whether the practise I have undertaken is illegal, but I'm pretty sure that because I have not claimed ownership of the images nor distributed them to make money, then it's not. I think this would be classed under 'artistic license'. Perhaps a slightly grey area. I understand if you don't agree with it, but please remember Wiki's are not subjective.

Also what I meant by main and secondary pages was that these would be sub-sections to a page, not separate pages. I saw that a lot of the dignitary pages were quite similar to the other dignitary pages in relation to a certain character, so perhaps the dignitaries should be considered a unit, unless one says or do something that stands out from the others.

I'm not too sure about what you are saying with regard to the images. User images are not in articles, so what about them? I can agree with you in that the galleries could do with some reform, like having the same image sizes and file types. These pages are mainly to capture the moments that character has in the film, Like on the  Let It Go  gallery page: it is to capture Elsa and the way she is feeling above all else.