Thread:AnnaElzaJ/@comment-43279580-20200906150357/@comment-30900271-20200907211538

I also re-read that one and it looks like that night ;)

Well, for me it's generally something like 'soft canon' things not debunked are legit, that's why I add them to the Wiki and I let others decide themselves what they think of it ;)

Yeah, you touched a quite important issue here - every Frozen book was written by someone else, so they have different ideas and might not be familiar with what's already in the franchise besides the movies...

It's an introduction to F2 definitely, for example showing why Anna became so protective while she was much more chilled-out in F1 ;) AFH shows something different, for example a backstory of Hans and what he was doing when it wasn't shown in the movie... For me 'soft canon' again - legit 'till debunked ;)