Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-11133912-20140802015558/@comment-27934123-20140802024825

Aghh...I also gotta add on because there was too much on my first reply anyways... Do you think that a new thing should be added to the rules about boundaries of such deep subjects and languages? (not to mention subjects like sexist, ageist, gender, straight/gay/lesbian... I could go one forever) Anons are usually posting this stuff on this wiki, as this first started out with the Oaken's family theory. I mean, Illuminati is definitely not for talking. I don't know whether they support it or are against it...hard to tell when they idolize Hans' character and consider Elsa's antagonistic in terrible ways. I don't really know what's so hard for just accepting the truth behind the movie, not just the sweet feels, minor flaws, but a little deeper than that, consider the characters' own actions and what happens in the movie instead of predicting out false information. I mean, the internet lies a lot and Elsa being an "Illuminati idol for kids" would be definitely false. People in my art center adore the movie Frozen, even the small children - they sing Let it Go daily. I suggest for anons to back off with this information. It's too much to handle and it's getting annoying now. Political subjects aren't to be discussed here either, wars, country disagreements, stuff like that, it's confusing and Frozen isn't even about that. (also throwing in some of the hate this movie's been getting and some of the anons were bothered enough to post such awful things here.) That's all I have for now, so my decision is a firm yes, disable them.