Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5189655-20150205205704/@comment-25389622-20150212205550

No, I'm done. I've now said all I have to. It's ultimately up to the community now. We have reached a stalemate. Just, two things: I don't care how convinced  you  are of something, present the evidence that WDAS considers the books in this way. Secondly, no one, said about anything becoming canon  automatically . To quote a wise man: " I will concede that calling the books canon is similarly speculative, but this is where we can exercise some common sense." Common sense, analysis of evidence, and sound conclusion based on such reasoning. You may say what you are saying about how they should not be considered canon, but what is the evidence to suggest that they should be?

As it stands:

For adding OUAT article(s): 4

Against such a notion: 4

Undecided/willing to give the notion more consideration: 1 Can I have a link to that definition please?