Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25389622-20141101150445/@comment-25389622-20150127234847

Yeah, I get that we can put on the page regarding the book about what they did, but say an article had a line along the links of, "Even though Elsa regretted the time she missed out with Anna, she understood that her parents were doing the best that they could (then cite)". Not sure of the exact wording, but you get it. I see nowhere in such a line where chronology is compromised.

You're saying that it should be left/right because it's a standard, and you said that you were going to add it to policy (if you see it fit), you alluded to policy. If not, tell me the difference between policy and a standard. Yes, but the  practical  ground you speak of is not applicable here because of the space separating the pictures - there's no risk of them being stacked in this case. Like I say, it was consistent, but messy. There also isn't enough supporting text to get that "wrap" that would be fine otherwise. You have to admit that this article is quite an exception due to how the description is laid out.

You're telling me xD I'm sorry, but as much as I enjoy a good ol' debate, it can be quite time consuming ;-) I'll sign off for the night now. Ask Fruipt; she's good at sorting us out. Wait, I don't know what you mean? I'm sure you don't mean that  I'm  psychopathic ;-) Unstable perhaps, or compulsive, but not psychopathic.