Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26102520-20150217150045/@comment-27557485-20150222231759

Okay, I know that I haven't been actively participating in this discussion, but I do have something to say. I do see why some of the admins should be re-evaulated. I admit, there are things on this wiki that need to be fixed; it is the admins' responsibility to help correct these issues, but their prolonged inactivity inteferes with the maintenance of this site. Re-evaluating the admins may not be a bad idea, as it would be going by policy and would, as you say, relieve the admins who have no use for their "extra tools". However, I do agree that a solution must be reached, and I will continue to further elaborate on this situation if I have more to say.

As for opening up nominations, there really is no user eligible for admin rights, since there are no rollbacks, which is a prerequisite for adminship.