Thread:Humphry02/@comment-26102520-20150713130752/@comment-26102520-20150713133820

It's a big assumption to be made, especially since many of the references were affected as a result. There's a reason sandboxes exist. Additionally, if you knew I could fix it, then why not ask about the edit before publishing? I know we're a community here, it's why I helped. However, it seems strange of you to assume I could fix your edit and publish it with mistakes when you could have messaged me, or anyone for that matter, prior to doing so. Say for instance, no one was around, then we'd have a page sitting up there rife with errors for who knows how long. I'd like you to consider quality of information over quantity of information (that is, displaying the information correctly, as opposed to adding it as fast as you can). I don't mind helping, but telling me to consider that we're a community site but not asking a fellow editor for help strikes me as hypocritical.

Perhaps you should use the classic editor then. The preview function would really be beneficial.

Depends how long the summary is; I think there's no point adding pictures if the article is only a paragraph long.