Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25389622-20141101150445/@comment-25389622-20150127223712

They haven't come out yet, and even when they do, I doubt that so much will be added that it will alter the format: I am suggesting a simple line or two. Maybe if I did it for one to show you what I mean...

All you did was discount it by citing the left/right policy, which I am not convinced at this moment is a good enough reason. Your other reason is that  you  don't see a problem with it, as opposed to  me  seeing a problem.

Well put it in before I go doing that again :P I never noticed that they alternated. And the images in question by no means appear to be stacked, so that is not an issue here. I don't see how it can be fixed policy if we are going to have exceptions. I suppose that it depends on how many exceptions there are.

''Also, the image in the "Description" section has text pushed past where the text of the section title begins; I guess it warrants being moved to the right too? '' There's not enough text to "wrap" around the bottom image. The top image could be moved, but the lighthouse image has so little text to accompany it that it is more of a problem. I'm aware that it is still at the bottom, but it looks more orderly. With it being on the right, it makes the whole section look neater. I scrolled down, the format being the same throughout, and there was that last section with an image jammed in on the left; it ruins the flow felt in the style of the rest of the article.

We should get some secondary input. I think it looks better: the palace is now more included, and the characters are not the  focus  of the image. You can see Elsa and the guards, and you can now see the scape which they are fighting on. The palace is the article's subject, and the previous angle involved Elsa and the guards' perspective too much. "The palace has more focus", that's exactly what we need for this article.

You're welcome :-) Yes, it's the only way that I retain my sanity as well. Or perhaps I am insane trying to discreetly buy the things every month :D Seriously, 6' 11" over here trying to buy a magazine from the kids section... I always go to self-service ;-)