Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26102520-20150217150045/@comment-27934123-20150227135223

I don't mean to be barging in like this, but...why is there a sudden proposal to remove the admins' rights all of a sudden? I'm all down for users like yourself, Heimr Arnadalr, to get involved to communities and such, but I doubt demoting admins and opening up community nominations is really all that necessary. For one thing, the users are pretty aware of the admins on here and have not complained about any one of them. I've been an admin ever since early 2014 and I had no problem merging or adapting to the new system around here. As a matter of fact, I love working with the admins we have now and it would be terrible if we have to go that far to replace any one of them for the "benefit" of the wiki, which I believe otherwise. Yes, I know how opinionated this post of mine is. Coming from me, I personally don't think that it's right to re-evaluate the admins, especially Bella. She's now the co-founder and we shouldn't be pushy about real-life situations.

Also, the reason why we decided to remove Littlerat's bureaucrat rights was not only because of past issues such as promoting random users to fit the title of admins (even before the merge, I was not picked by Littlerat but by AnnoyingOrange who had a chat interview with me. He also had ties with the Frozen Disney Wiki back then, so then other admins got involved, and now we're here), as well as Littlerat being inactive for an extremely long time. Littlerat has made no edits on articles for months, most of them were responses to messages left on their wall and comments. On April 2014, Littlerat tried to remind us of returning sometime soon, but that time never really did come. The admins and I have been here for a relatively long period of time, and I'd gladly welcome the new people, Fruipit and Humphry, to the department. I say a no for re-evaluating.