Thread:Wolf 91/@comment-24199126-20141208134838/@comment-24199126-20150106005227

Because he can? What kind of reasoning to refute our claims is that supposed to be? Enough is enough. You can ignore fact if you want, that's your prerogative, but for the purposes of the Wiki, the information about Hans' past is sourced, and as such, it's FACT.

You can believe Hans was not neglected and that he was inherently evil, but on the articles, we report fact. As long as you do not remove that information from the article, you can consider this discussion over because I'm tired of going in circles with this.