Thread:Heimr Arnadalr/@comment-25389622-20150509213304/@comment-25389622-20150510130827

It's not that talking about the gates no longer makes it a summary, it's just we weren't talking in the context of them before. For the top paragraphs we don't need information like skating or gates - we're just giving an overview.

The books suggest that she stopped shutting people out, Frozen Fever also does the same. She's in the town with her people, interacting with the children. She organises parties for Anna with the staff, Elsa and Anna stay in an inn in the village. There is everything after the events of the film to show that she stopped shutting people out. She wasn't introvert, she was trying to protect those around her, so closing everyone out was a necessity. Now that she is able to control her powers and has no fear of hurting anyone, she is happy to spend time with others. What "actual psychology"? I don't think there's such a thing. Even if you could cite some evidence, the tests are chock-full of errors and unknowns which could not be controlled. Plus I don't think that you can apply any "real world" psychology to a Disney film, let alone a character with magical abilities (which are by definition supernatural and so can't be understood). It's got nothing to do with how I perceive Elsa; my judgments are made when considering her interactions and character from all Frozen-related media, and I'd say that they're pretty informed.

I didn't say that it's no longer a summary, all I said was that for a summary you do not need to add such context. There was no mention of the gates closing, so we do not say about them opening now. This also makes sense when the article goes on to talk about them and everything else in a lot more detail. Either way, Dragonboy resolved the issue as the last sentences are concise but now include the part about embracing her powers, which is key to her character.