Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25389622-20141101150445/@comment-25389622-20150111024353

2. Most likely the guards, hence the predicament they find themselves. But it's still too uncertain to say for sure. "there's no reason to be mentioning them when they aren't mentioned." Haha, yeah, fine :-)

6. It's the word savage that makes it longer then necessary. Hans hadn't killed her yet, " smiling in triumph over killing Elsa", this statement is not true. And don't pull the effectively card on me :P I guess that it would (and did) take the sight of Anna for everyone to go "ooooh... I see now". Elsa isn't yet dead. Besides, Hans' death sentence wasn't the most official in the world. I would have asked for Anna's body before agreeing to that. Where's your evidence Hans? No trial either? You're going to make a terrible leader. But that's me speaking in hindsight :P  "Hans could have been smiling at the thought of spilling blood." Yuck. I wouldn't go that far...

8. Yes, it was too out-of-universe, I'll give you that. It could have been reworded though, but as we're unsure of the emotion... Let's say aware then, or wary.

9. Leadership, not possession. "His friends" is different to his troops anyway. I'll review it.



I shall :-)