It has come to my attention that the user Alex90000 has been vandalizing the following wiki pages : Hans Westergaard, Elsa, Anna, Kristoff, Olaf, Frozen. To view how he has done so, here is the link to his contributions that myself and at least one other had undone (as a side note for Elsa, I would recommend someone to help with the character profile box to show all her appearances as I was only able to get her current look):  https://frozen.fandom.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Alex90000 

Therefore, it is my personal recommendation he gets banned PERMANENTLY.

WarGrowlmon18 asked me to move this discussion out of his wall so I did.

I believe that the Conceal, don't feel can still contain some informations about Elsa despite describing an alternate history. Also I think that a transcript of the story would fit well to the book's page.

Original discussion can be found here

It has come to my attention that the pages for Elsa and her immediate family have been changed to describe the events of Elsa and Anna being told the story of the Northuldra, and the accident, occurring on the same night. I take issue with this for the following reason.

The citation is not being used correctly; if you listen to what Jennifer Lee says in the source, which is somewhat vague as it is, it goes along the lines that the events can be said to have happened on the same night, not necessarily that they did. The bottom line is that she is not explicit enough, and so we cannot definitely say that this is the case. She even says that “it doesn’t have to be that night”, and “in my head it’s that night”. So this is something Lee is saying as conjecture and not as the director making a canonical statement about the Frozen universe.

The resolution should be either to find a more definitive source, and in the meantime change the pages so that the events happening on the same night is not as matter-of-fact; for, example, just saying "some time later". Granted, it should not be changed to "on another night" or something along those lines.

There were a couple of changes to the wiki's look wanted by me and Humphry and talked about for quite a while in our ongoing discussions so I thought that it's a good time to discuss them more openly.

First thing proposed by me is a snowing effect on the wiki's main header similar to what is on the bottom tool bar. Here is a CSS code to check it out for those familiar with the concept of a personal CSS file.

/*snowing header - full*/
.wds-community-header::before
{
    background-image:url("images.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20121124181036/austinally/images/5/56/Sno_ani05.gif"), linear-gradient(to right, rgba(8, 76, 146, 0.5), rgba(8, 76, 146, 0.5)), linear-gradient(to left, rgba(8, 76, 146, 0) 200px, rgb(8, 76, 146) 430px);
}

For those who are unfamiliar with personal CSS. You just have to paste the code here and everything will appear to you as if the code was on the wiki.

Second thing proposed is a custom mouse cursor. It should be the element symbol from Frozen II. This is proposed by Humphry so I don't have the code to show it off.

Third thing that is also proposed by Humphry is a wiki background without the dark blue stripe in the middle.

Last thing that you may have already noticed is the randomized wiki logo. This is something that was once unintentionally removed and it's now brought back in it's original state. It's now open for further improvements.

Hello all

I want to get an idea of how relevant the few active members feel about the administrative structure on this site. As you may well be aware I am currently the only active administrator, and have been since roughly October of last year. While the period has seen a lull in activity there have been a few recent events that make it clear that the site needs more than just one administrator to attend to its needs.

I also take issue with having pages stating which admins are active, which they are in fact not. It would look poor to remove the “active” status the only other member, hence my reluctance to do this. It should also be noted that I reached out to the only other "active" administrator but have since had no reply back.

Before I take any action I wish to give anyone who wishes the opportunity to voice their opinions on the matter; and so we may come to a consensus, based on which I will act.

To conclude: Does the community believe the current administrative structure to be inadequate; and what steps can be taken to correct for this?

Thank you for your attention.

I would like to replace the infoboxes on character pages with the new portable infoboxes and have multiple pictures of each character. For example on the Elsa's page, there could be a picture of young Elsa, Elsa at coronation, Elsa as snow queen, etc.

Here's the idea somewhat materialised:
https://frozen.fandom.com/wiki/Template:Infobox_Character_Portable https://frozen.fandom.com/wiki/User:Tomas9970/Sandbox

It obviously needs a CSS theme but that's something that I can't do myself. I think that the colors should be same as the current infoboxes. The title should be dark blue with headers being light blue, white backgroud for data and maybe light gray backgroud for labels.

The pictures used in the example are placeholders that I've found on the wiki but I already have all pictures of Anna and Elsa except for the Frozen II stuff. All of the pictures should be in 1:1 aspect ratio to prevent the rest of the infobox from "jumping" while switching between them. The 1:1 aspect ratio allows pictures to have a bit of background while still being a portrait.

Some pictures are not as good as the other but that's because there simply isn't any good scene. This mainly applies to Frozen Fever where the characters are rarely looking into the camera.

That's about everything I have to say about it and I would like to know your opinion as well as some ideas on how it could be improved.

I've been working on making pages for the scores from the soundtrack and one in particular I really liked played when Anna, Elsa, Kristoff, Olaf, and Sven were journeying to the forest (where they passed by Elsa's ice castle), appears to not be on there.

Does anyone know if I'm missing something? Or if it's on there under a different name (like the prequel Star Wars soundtracks were fond of doing)?

I've noticed that there is a couple of interesting paintings of places in the Portrait room. Other than the obvious ones like the Arendelle castle and the Valley of the living rock, there is also a painting of what looks like Arendelle (you can see the clock tower) with a giant iceberg behind it and a painting of a monolith of some sort in a very rocky area.

Can someone please explain these two paintings to me?

It seems Wikia is once again promoting "Honest Trailers" on their main page with Frozen 2 being highlighted.

Is anyone else annoyed by this? Also, why are we expected to care what Honest Trailers has to say about Frozen 2 (or any movie quite frankly)?

Are they going to start pushing CinemaSins and Hishe next?

Let know your thoughts on this sad promoting, my fellow Frozen fans!

Hey guys, has anyone else bought any Frozen related  themed products?

This can be anything like: food, books, games etc.

Having only become a fan of the franchise recently, the only stuff I have gotten so far has been a Frozen 2 poster and some Frozen themed food (that has been or is the process of being consumed ;p).

Enable the other forum named "Discussions".

Does anybody want a Frozen Disney Plus series! I know I do! You should sign this petition! http://chng.it/TdTNqXXD

According to DVDs ReleaseDates, Frozen 2 is coming to DVD and Blu-Ray February 25! 

Who's ready to get (the imo) best movie of 2019!

I keep checking DVDs Release Dates for Frozen 2's, but I can't help but notice the score keeps going down everytime I check the site. Here is the link to the page. I remember the score being a lot higher last year (in the 4's somewhere) so I find this downward score to be suspicious at best. Do you all think this legit or are people angry at someone involved in the film?

I just read on the Disney Wiki that Frozen Fever and Olaf's: Frozen Future have alleged backlash on the internet.

Now I sadly didn't become a fan of this amazing franchise until recently with the release of the awesome sequel, but what is the problem with these shorts? 

I just watched them both recently and loved them. So I'm confused about this and wanted to see if anyone can explain this to me.

Frozen 2 has surpassed Frozen 1 to become the highest grossing animated movie of all time!

This is incredible news! 

Now, we can only hope we can get Frozen 3 next!

File:Into The Unknown - Frozen 2 - Frozen dolls - Elsa - Into the unknown parody-1

I think there is going to be a great battle in Frozen 3 between good and evil.

Maybe a powerful sorcerer will appear and he will create evil elementals and Elsa and Anna will have to face the threat and stop the mage and his army consisting mainly of spirits from laying waste to Enchanted forest.Elsa will probably have another spiritual initiation and will have to accept some new powers. What are your ideas and theories on Frozen 3 and other future sequels? Leave your thoughts here.

These store windows are all Frozen themed..Pretty cool

https://youtu.be/QkkN9_8xWoI

Where did Elsa's powers come from?