What's on your mind?
TEXT
POLL
- All313 posts
- General148 posts
- Reporting Office1 post
- For Our Admins14 posts
- Questions and Answers30 posts
- General Discussion53 posts
- Cool Fun27 posts
- News and Announcements40 posts
Sort by
Card Layout
News and Announcements
40 Posts
497 Replies
Is streaming on Disney+ as of today!
Ive been waiting but im going to watch tomorrow on Anna’s birthday with some krumkake too.
Frozen 3 will be released in 2027. Frozen 4 was teased to resolve unanswered questions.
Concept art:
Frozen 4 was officially announced today!!!!! I believe it will be released in 2025 or 2026, Frozen III I think in 2024 or 2025, The two films seem to be in development together.
(Edited by Schum uwou)
Frozen III is officially in development! Elsa and Olaf are the only two confirmed characters returning at the moment, even though Anna and Kristoff are expected to be apart of the film!
Sources:
https://twitter.com/idinamenzel/status/1623817552940916739
https://twitter.com/joshgad/status/1623454558998659073
<p>Hello all
</p><p>I want to get an idea of how relevant the few active members feel about the administrative structure on this site. As you may well be aware I am currently the only active administrator, and have been since roughly October of last year. While the period has seen a lull in activity there have been a few recent events that make it clear that the site needs more than just one administrator to attend to its needs.
</p><p>I also take issue with having pages stating which admins are active, which they are in fact not. It would look poor to remove the “active” status the only other member, hence my reluctance to do this. It should also be noted that I reached out to the only other "active" administrator but have since had no reply back.
</p><p>Before I take any action I wish to give anyone who wishes the opportunity to voice their opinions on the matter; and so we may come to a consensus, based on which I will act.
</p><p>To conclude: Does the community believe the current administrative structure to be inadequate; and what steps can be taken to correct for this?
</p><p>Thank you for your attention.
</p>
(Edited by Humphry02)
<p>According to DVDs ReleaseDates, Frozen 2 is coming to DVD and Blu-Ray February 25!
</p><p>Who's ready to get (the imo) best movie of 2019!
</p>
(Edited by TheOne1000)
<p>Frozen 2 has surpassed Frozen 1 to become the highest grossing animated movie of all time!
</p><p>This is incredible news!
</p><p>Now, we can only hope we can get Frozen 3 next!
</p>
(Edited by TheOne1000)
<figure class="article-thumb t " style="width: px">File:Into The Unknown - Frozen 2 - Frozen dolls - Elsa - Into the unknown parody-1 <figcaption></figcaption></figure>
(Edited by Frozen 2 smiling kid)
<p>I've recently created a Croatian version of this wiki, if any of you know Croatian or are interested, check it out :)
</p><p>https://snjezno-kraljevstvo.fandom.com/hr
</p>
(Edited by Imjustthere)
<p>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ here is the Trailer!
</p>
(Edited by The Corrupted Diamond)
This post is locked.
<p>Hello users of Frozen Wiki,
</p><p>It has come to my attention that the Admins of this site have become increasingly inactive. Not long ago we held a discussion regarding the removal and possible replacement of said individuals, though it was met with opposition somewhat. However, time has passed, and little has changed. Thus, I propose stripping Bella8991 and Dragonboy6491 of their user rights. Mojojojo13579 has had enough of a presence that I think we can allow her to slide. But both Bella and Dragonboy have an "inactive" tag for crying out loud. They should be removed and new Admins put in place. We now have three rollbacks who can fill the role (Fruipit, Humphry02, and myself), so we are not in the same position as last time, where there were no suitable candidates anyway.
</p>
(Edited by administrators)
This post is locked.
<p>Hello users!
</p><p>So I've recently gone about setting up something that should have been done a long time ago, but it slipped my mind. I have currently set up a bot (under the trusty moniker Dragonbot6491) and I'm sure it will prove useful in the future for any tedious changes (e.g. links/text replacements) that we would ordinarily have to do en masse. In the interests of not flooding the activity section though, we need to agree as a community on giving the account a bot flag, so please comment to show your support for this proposal.
</p><p>The bot appears to be in working condition, as I have made two edits with it already; however, do note these changes are small and that there's a definite learning curve.
</p><p>
Best thoughts, </p><p>Dragonboy </p>
Best thoughts, </p><p>Dragonboy </p>
(Edited by Dragonboy6491)
This post is locked.
<p>Sadly, this is not an April Fools joke. On Twitter, Jennifer Lee announced that the production of the sequel has been cancelled due to lack of time and budget costs. Let us hope that we will get our sequel back one day. And hopefully, this announcement is just her little April Fools joke.
</p><p>However, recently, a live-action film for Mulan has been announced. What are your thoughts on this? Please leave all your opinions in the comments. Thank you.
</p>
(Edited by administrators)
<div style="background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #21D4F4 -60%, #0067e7 100%); background-image: -webkit-linear-gradient(top, #21A3C7 -60%, #21A3C7 100%); background-image: -ms-linear-gradient(top, #21A3C7 -60%, #21A3C7 100%); -moz-border-radius: 12px; -webkit-border-radius: 12px; border-radius: 12px; font-family: century gothic; font-size: 120%; color:black;">
<div style="background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #21A3C7 -60%, #21A3C7 100%); background-image: -webkit-linear-gradient(top, #00A6C4 -60%, #00A6C4 100%); background-image: -ms-linear-gradient(top, #00A6C4 -60%, #00A6C4 100%); -moz-border-radius: 12px; -webkit-border-radius: 12px; border-radius: 12px; font-family: century gothic; font-size: 120%; color:black; border: 5px solid #59c3e2; margin-left:10px; margin-right:10px; text-align:center;">
<table border="0" style="width: 10px;"><tr><td>
</td></tr><tr><td>
</td></tr></table><div class="center"><div class="floatnone">
</div></div>
<p>With Frozen Fever premiering March 13th with the live-action Cinderella, we are all already pumped up and excited to get our popcorn and get to the theater. But, to unleash even more excitement, the sequel for Frozen has been announced! It is trending all over social media but I thought that it'd be necessary to announce it anyway. What are your thoughts? How do you feel about this sequel? Let us know in the comments!
</p><p>Source
</p>
<table border="0" style="width: 10px;"><tr><td>
</td></tr><tr><td>
</td></tr></table><div class="center"><div class="floatnone">
</div></div>
</div> </div>
</div></div>
<p>With Frozen Fever premiering March 13th with the live-action Cinderella, we are all already pumped up and excited to get our popcorn and get to the theater. But, to unleash even more excitement, the sequel for Frozen has been announced! It is trending all over social media but I thought that it'd be necessary to announce it anyway. What are your thoughts? How do you feel about this sequel? Let us know in the comments!
</p><p>Source
</p>
<table border="0" style="width: 10px;"><tr><td>
</td></tr><tr><td>
</td></tr></table><div class="center"><div class="floatnone"></div></div>
</div> </div>
(Edited by administrators)
This post is locked.
<p>Hello users! It's recently come to my attention that when we drafted up the manual of style a couple months back, we neglected to discuss date formats. I've looked around the Wiki and I've seen the following:
</p><p>I'm going to use the <i>Frozen Fever</i> release date as an example since it's coming out soon ^^
</p><p>March 13, 2015
</p><p>03/13/2015*
</p><p>2015-03-13*
</p><p>13 March 2015
</p><p>As you can see, it's a confusing mess having this many formats, so I'm proposing choosing a standard one to be used at all times. I'm inclined towards the "13 March 2015" format since it is not confusing (no chance of mixing up numbers for months with days, i.e. the formats denoted with a *), and it doesn't need commas. Yet, <i>Frozen</i> has American origins, so I can see the rationale for using the "March 13, 2015" format. Let me know what you think! :)
</p>
(Edited by Dragonboy6491)
<p>Greetings users. So over the past few weeks, the other admins and I have worked to finish what we started with the MoS and revamp our policies. The old list of Do's and Don'ts was extremely long and emphasized following rules to the letter when it is more important to think about the spirit behind the rules.
</p><p>Most of these are based off of Wikipedia/Wookieepedia policies, since they're so well-established. But if anything needs clarifying or fixing, that's what this thread is for :)
</p><p>Link to policy page: Frozen Wiki:Policy.
</p>
(Edited by Dragonboy6491)
<p>Hello users! So about a month back, we posted a thread about establishing formal image policy. In case you've forgotten/weren't around, we've established the following:
</p><p>1) Images must be used on an article (e.g. no uploading just for user page/blog/thread) or be deleted
</p><p>2) No fan art/manipulated photos; they will be deleted on sight
</p><p>3) If you require a photo that goes against the above guidelines, you are free to link one using Photobucket/Imageshack. Do NOT upload it to the Wiki though.
</p><p>4) The Wiki is NOT a image repository, so the old "add whatever picture you want" type galleries have been discontinued. They will currently only consist of whatever images we do have of the subject matter.
</p><p>Since these guidelines were established, the other Administrators and I have gone about purging images. We have gone from over 2000 images to 500; however, the images deleted were mostly unused files/gallery photos. I ask you now to help the process by adding {{delete}} to whatever images violate policy. This will mark an image for deletion and speed up the process since we'll have more eyes on lookout. Thank you :)
</p>
(Edited by Dragonboy6491)
This post is locked.
<p>Greetings Frozen Wiki users,
</p><p>This is a thread to discuss the removal of Littlerat's Bureaucrat and Administrator privileges on the grounds that <i>she has had a long history of inactivity</i>, dating back to the Frozen Wiki's inception. An Administrator/Bureaucrat should be always have a presence on the Wiki to help it develop and grow. But Littlerat has not been actively shaping the Wiki and <i>the community deserves far better</i>. Littlerat has not logged on for many months and so I am thus proposing that we remove her rights by informing Wikia Staff, since asking her to step down is an unlikely option.
</p><p>Please state whether you consent to this proposal or oppose.
</p><p>--Dragonboy
</p>
(Edited by Dragonboy6491)
This post is locked.
<p>So it has come to our attention that we need to establish clear site policies and without doubt one of them is with regards to images.
</p><p>If you see our unused file list, there are literally hundreds of unused files on the Wiki. As a result, images should henceforth only be uploaded for usage on articles. Unused images have to be deleted as they take up space. Since copyright is an issue, manipulated photos should not be uploaded but have you need for anything special for your own user page, then linking from Photobucket is an option.
</p><p>However, the stance on galleries is currently still under debate. It is true that a picture is worth a thousand words but many of our current galleries consist of repetitive, frame-by-frame shots of the movie. Our articles should do a good job of describing what is occurring and so having a stockpile of images rather diminishes the value of the written word. That being said, the galleries have been around since the start of this Wiki and so it would be wrong for me (I haven't been around nearly as long as some other users) to make a sweeping decision when it very much deserves a community discussion. So a statement on your stance and some reasoning would be very much appreciated :)
</p>
(Edited by Dragonboy6491)
