That's a good point. However, I intend to give users full control over what will appear on their User Page. Is there an proximity number of how many articles would have to be rewritten?

All of them have to be checked to match standards so that's 291 pages there. Of those though, I'd say only the character pages are in any need of major rewrites.

AwesomeOrange, what's your opinion on 'manipulated’ images? Thanks.

Dragonboy, I may be mistaken, but the pages on here are identical to that of the normal Wiki. These pages concern major characters mainly, but I'm pretty sure that they have lifted off of here. What should be done? Would an overhaul resolve the matter, or would they just copy that?

Also, if you rewrite a page, would you do it externally, and then just copy and paste in the final document?

Final point, will the relationship issue impact on the number of pages? I'm sure the number will rise again with the advent of Frozen Fever. I know that it's not out until spring, but we can't have Elsa's page the size it is and then add more information onto it.

All content on Wiki pages are available for other sites to use due to Creative Commons Licensing so if anyone wants to lift content from another Wiki, it's allowed. As such, the Wiki was once essentially a copy-paste of content from Disney Wiki. There's been a lot of work done since then but I'd personally like to have all of Wiki content to be ours 100% of the way through with no derivations whatsoever. I also don't agree with how Disney Wiki formats its articles so that's another reason to rewrite. I'm of the opinion we can rewrite our articles to be better than what they are.

And how I rewrite depends on how much I can do at a time. If it's just one section, I'll stick with source editor. But if I'm trying to do the whole thing, I go external and then copy-paste.

The relationship pages being moved to a single page per character will lower our page count, yes. But it's not something I'm too concerned about because quality trumps quantity.

I fully agree. Could I also say that maybe we should omit relationships like Hans and Sven/Olaf etc; they're kind of unnecessary. The same goes for the Dignitary relationships. Unless they some how stand out from the others in how they affect character directly, then they should be grouped as one. You could say how for Elsa they all have respect for her. I'm not sure if you have noticed but whenever Anna is walking over to Elsa in the ball room she is seen finishing a conversation with at least on of the dignitaries. The way they curtly nod and smile seems to back up the idea of respect. That's just one element that could be included, but I guess we'll address it later when the articles are actually reconfigured. There should be a strict way to lay out the pages; how to lay out a character page, environment page, etc. Each section should then have a formula. So say it makes a point, backs it up, and then summarises or concludes. This may not always be necessary all of the time, however.

If you know how to add them, go ahead.

I think he means your stance on having them on the wiki :P

Yeah, the Hans and Sven/Olaf definitely have to go. Not enough actual interaction. I guess for Elsa there could be a slight blurb about the dignitaries especially since they all were shocked at her "killing Anna". But I'd say the important thing is to revamp the character pages themselves before starting on the relationships.

And the MoS details exactl how to layout the pages so that's not a problem. The question is how feasible my proposed layouts are. We may have to swap out or add more sections if necessary.

(doing homework, just popping in for this)

Do we need quotes? It's a very OOU section for an IU article...

Yeah, that would probably be an example of something that needs to be taken out. The only quote we really need is one at the top of the character's page. Otherwise, we might as well just post the whole script for the film.