I wish to apologize for my inactivity and will of course step down if there is consensus. However, I think a lot of the same points brought up last time are being overlooked. For one, there was no effort to make contact with the admins regarding this issue, which would have been the courteous thing to do. Secondly, what is the goal of removing inactive admins? Is it just to bring new blood to the administration? I don't find that a compelling reason for demotion. This wiki is very small, and though work on wikis cannot ever truly be done, we have largely completed our intended improvements on articles. This along with the fact that Frozen is a property comprised of only one major work means that things are bound to slow down. As such, there is no backlog of tasks that admins need to do (delete files, track vandalism, etc.), which naturally means that the admins would be somewhat inactive as well. Should the wiki burst into activity, this discussion could be of more use, but for now, there is no real evidence that the admins are not adequately performing their duties because, well, there hasn't been much activity.
Additionally, and I'm not trying to make excuses for myself and the other admins, but being an admin isn't about being the best and most active contributor; we're here to keep things tidy and organized, anything else is really a plus. I think that's the heart of problem in this scenario; you're trying to pass off administratorship as a sort of political position when, to be completely honest, it's nothing more than janitorial work. The wiki hasn't descended into complete disarray, so it would be unfair to say the admins have been incompetent ... Not to toot my own horn, but I think I have shown that I understand the workings of the wiki and that I am capable of being a strong contributor.
In closing, this wiki's current needs are being met, so to be frank, I don't find demotion to be necessary. Again, if things pick up and the current admins cannot keep up, then we can consider stripping rights.