What was the logic for adding in the "Family" subsection to the infoboxes? I object to it based on the same reasoning as having "relatives". It is also inaccurate to call Kristoff Elsa's broth-in-law at this stage.
I don't think there are necessarily fewer family members. It will also get cluttered if, say, Anna were to have children. Perhaps only direct descendants could be included, or siblings. But there was still no discussion and no precedent has been set. For now things are best left as they are.
It looked worse for having to explain the connection to the respective character in parentheses too.
There may be scope on the relationships pages to have some kind of "family tree" if more of a summary is considered desirable, but trying to summarise it in the infoboxes will lead to them being cluttered.
Further to this discussion (which you can still contribute to) I am going to request adoption of this Wiki at Community Central. This is due to a lack of activity by other administrators, and because I feel that this will give me the powers needed to constructively improve this Wiki.
Before I officially request the adoption, I want to give members on the Wiki the opportunity to express their own views. Please see my nomination on the "Obtaining user rights" page. You may leave a comment in response to it with your views on the nomination. It will be nice to have some consensus either way in this regard. As you are a recent contributing user I decided to contact you personally.
Got it and I no longer feel like mentioning it is required because, well, everyone is biased if he tries and there are other ways of not letting it go through other than mentioning it and leting others consider it.